a:5:{s:8:"template";s:51485:" {{ keyword }}

SHREE YAMUNA ENTERPRISE

SHREE YAMUNA ENTERPRISE

{{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 0 }}
Shree Yamuna Enterprises
Menu
  • Home
  • About Us
  • PROFILE
  • Products
    • ARTIFICIALl SWEETNER
      • ASPARTAME
      • SUCRALOSE
      • Ack
      • NEOTAME
    • TASTE ENHANCER
      • MSG
    • HYDRO COLLOIDS
      • XANTHAM GUM M.S.G
      • CARRAGEENAN GUM
    • FOOD ADDITIVES
      • POTASSIUM SORBATE/ SORBIC ACID
    • PRESERVATIVES
      • SODIUM BENZOITE
    • CITRIC ASCID AND SERIES
      • CITRIC ACID MONO
      • CITRIC ACID ANHYDROUS
      • SODIUM CITRATE
    • PROPYLENE GLYCOLS
      • MONO PROPYLENE GLYCOL
      • DI PROPYLENE GLYCOL
    • OTHERS
      • SUCRALOSE ASPARTAME
      • ACESULFAME POTASSIUM
      • G.M.S/ CALCIUM PROPIONATE
      • COCOA PAWDER ALKALISED
  • Services
  • Contact Us
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 33 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 34 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 35 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 36 }}
    • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 37 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 38 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 39 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 40 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 41 }}
    • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 42 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 43 }}
    • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 44 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 45 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 46 }}
    • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 47 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 48 }}
    • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 49 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 50 }}
    • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 51 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 52 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 53 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 54 }}
    • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 55 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 56 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 57 }}
    • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 58 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 59 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 60 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 61 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 62 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 63 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 64 }}

{{ keyword }}

{{ keyword }}{{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 65 }}

  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 66 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 67 }}

{{ text }}

{{ links }}

  • HAVE A QUESTIONS ?+91-9223433898
  • INFO@YAMUNA.CO
  • A-703, GOKUL NAGAR, B/H PAREKH NAGAR, S.V ROAD KANDIVALI (W), MUMBAI-400067, INDIA

{{ keyword }}

{{ keyword }}

  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 68 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 69 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 70 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 71 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 72 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 73 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 74 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 75 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 76 }}

{{ keyword }}

A-703, GOKUL NAGAR, B/H PAREKH NAGAR, S.V ROAD KANDIVALI (W), MUMBAI-400067, INDIA

{{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 77 }}

{{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 78 }}

© 2020 SHREE YAMUNA ENTERPRISE. All Rights Reserved.
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 79 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 80 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 81 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 82 }}
    • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 83 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 84 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 85 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 86 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 87 }}
    • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 88 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 89 }}
    • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 90 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 91 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 92 }}
    • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 93 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 94 }}
    • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 95 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 96 }}
    • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 97 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 98 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 99 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 100 }}
    • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 101 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 102 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 103 }}
    • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 104 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 105 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 106 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 107 }}
      • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 108 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 109 }}
  • {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 110 }}
";s:4:"text";s:24717:"People often get caught up in believing that their interpretations are true to an extent that leaves them caught in an unhelpful trap. Please feel free to discard whatever is not useful to you. (In your essay, it seems like you might prefer to use judgment" as a synonym for discernment. ). Your partner might say, Hmmm, thats an interesting way to do it, when they really mean, Youre doing it wrong. Or for example, you might say to your wife, And here you are finally, late as usual. Youre pretending to make a straightforward observation, but youre really mixing in your judgments, thoughts, and feelings. By choosing "Accept", you agree to the storage of all types of cookies used on the site. In contrast, couples who know how to discuss their disagreements in a healthy way are able to nip problems in the bud before they turn into big, relationship-ending issues. The 10 Commandments of Clean Communication 1. Price: US $24.84. I recommend to my NVC students that they not use the word need when attempting to speak using NVC, to help avoid this pitfall. You also write, in regard to NVC, "In not requiring the speaker to reveal how they would benefit, in my opinion, there is a lack of clarity and also a denial of ownership.. Note to self: There could be value in articulating more explicitly when to use the model." NVC leads to a realization that it is really valuable to orient oneself to assuming there is some positive reason behind a no, and being curious about that reason. So, I suppose it is naturally that there are words that are in a grey zone slightly but not extremely charged, and naming important experiences that are hard to point to otherwise so that they get included on NVC feelings lists, and it is hoped that the practitioner will use discernment about whether it is likely to be helpful or unhelpful to use that word in the context of a particular conversation. This matches what Clean Talk advocates for, albeit with an extra stage of checking first before offering judgments. You quote Chapman Flack saying, "[Dr. Rosenberg's] advice never to hear thoughts . But, practices like The Work of Byron Katie engage more directly in helping people to break free of the traps their beliefs set for them. This framework is less tied to coercive associations with there being one right/objective perspective, and with searching for who to give social approval to and who to punish with disapproval. In the story I made up, there was a role play happening, and the person just wanted to know whether they were being asked to be themselves, or put themselves in another's shoes. While the focus of this post is communication in a romantic relationship, much of this also applies to personal interactions in all areas of your life. autocad apple silicon; characteristics of an effective organizational structure; clean talk communication Some NVC practitioners are able to integrate their use of connection skills with keeping a focus on the purpose they are attending to, and this can result in a high degree of effectiveness. This framework offers a reliable basis for seeing beauty and nobility in all people and in every part of our psyche an intellectual framework that, when it is exercised fully, inevitably leads people to experience love and compassion. The whole system is about supporting people in making more life-serving choices that fit the circumstances. This is based on user satisfaction (60/100), press buzz (56/100), recent user trends (rising), and other relevant information on CleanTalk gathered from around the web. You say "What strikes me most about this practice is that it attempts to hide what we're really feeling from the other person, which seems to me a form of deception. I respectfully disagree. The key to this kind of positive interaction is what the authors of Couple Skills call clean communication. Matthew McKay, Patrick Fanning, and Kim Paleg (hereafter referred to as MFP) define clean communication as taking responsibility for the impact of what you say. By being more intentional about their communication techniques and leaving out rhetoric that wounds ones partner and creates defensiveness, a couple creates a safe place in which to honestly and respectfully work through their differences. Again, this isnt addressed in the book you read. It is the norm for some people to get their way (superficially) and for others to submit, or for overt or covert rebellion to happen. To some extend this can and does work and sometimes it doesnt. Buy It Now. You continue, "Anger is a signal that a boundary has been crossed. However, my hope is that NVC practitioners will express interpretations in contexts where it is useful to do so, and be willing to listen to interpretation, and treat them as invitations to carry the conversation somewhere deeper. In: An or else statement shouldnt be thrown around, and it shouldnt be punitive. I take Dr. Rosenbergs admonitions about thoughts as an invitation to notice when conversing at the level of interpretations isnt getting me where Id like to go, and when that happens, to be willing to drop down to a deeper level of awareness where I feel into what is happening, notice the barriers to open-heartedness, imagine the human aspirations in play, and remember my intention to find a way forward that works for everyone, or at the least, honors my deepest values. It's called the "Clean Buildings, Clean Air" ordinance. Note to self: Is there something Id like to tell students to give them more guidance about how to navigate potential reactions to empathy guesses by people not used to NVC? This could equally well be an example of NVC. 1. Podcast #862: Heal the Body With Extended Fasting, Podcast #761: How Testosterone Makes Men, Men, How Saunas Can Help Save Your Body, Mind, and Spirit, Podcast #852: The Brain Energy Theory of Mental Illness, The Insanely Difficult Standards of Historys Hardest P.E. how to use html tags in java string; windows 11 startup programs folder; cmake object library tutorial; what your 3rd grader needs to know pdf; allusion and alliteration Note to self: Consider seeking more understanding around this point, to support assessing whether this is something I feel would add useful clarity. To address some of the issues youve raised, I think it will be helpful to offer a little more background on NVC as I understand it. Plus, your partner will likely be hurt that youre still holding onto something she thought youd forgiven her for, and you both will feel like your relationship isnt progressing. We strive to make the Internet more secure and to help webmasters and website owners to prevent malicious activity. We provide plugins and API to block forum spam, board spam, blog spam, web site spam with their spreading spam, abusing forms on web sites and other annoyances. It can easily encourage precisely the sort of good/bad dichotomous thinking NVC means to transform. Its not about whether or not something is needed for survival, but whether its recognizable to most people as something that tends to support human beings in thriving; its not about conveying a sense of urgency; and saying the word need when using NVC is not required by the model and is often likely to be counter-productive. To do this, you want to swap out your you-centered accusations for statements that emphasize I how you feel when your partner does certain things. We take responsibility for the anger as ours, and not as being about them in the way that it might superficially appear to be. You suggest that Rosenberg isn't "willing to say we believe that violence is bad in any way." But, over time, we build up trust that there are alternatives to moralistic judgments, and we more naturally are able to go straight to a new way of relating to things. When we raise our voice, withdraw into cold hostility, adopt a sneering tone, or employ biting sarcasm, we can wound those we love. cisco sd-wan cloud onramp for saas deployment guide clean talk communication. Its hard to move forward if you keep rehashing the past; instead, let sleeping dogs lie. Which want might it be helpful to express? My take on your comparison is that the issues you point to, variously: It all seems valuable to me to engage with. Through proven brand-building strategies, we position companies for success on the journey from brand awareness to brand loyalty. What Should You Do? But, these can be reduced, over time, with practice. In my judgment, hiding what you're doing is a form of deception, and deception is a form of violence." Clean 7 is a 7-Day detox program that blends Intermittent Fasting, Ayurveda, and Functional Medicine for powerful . Checks the existing comments and users for spam, We use cookies to provide our services and analyze site usage in accordance with our Privacy Policy. To keep things amicable, adopt an open, rather than closed posture. Considering the three beliefs you named, the one that stimulates a little concern in me is I think what I did was wrong. It all depends on what associations you have with an action being wrong. If you associate being wrong with I deserve to be punished and to suffer, then I would be concerned that this belief may amount to a type of violence towards self that may ultimately contribute to there being more violence in the world. (These are my own definitions, but they likely roughly correspond to what other NVC trainers would think of when they hear these terms. Messy talk and clean technology: communication, problem-solving and Clean communication means keeping your voice as close to your normal tone and volume as possible. We also offer strategy and execution . FAQs . When I guess the reason behind the no, its essential that we guess a reason that we express something that is perfectly human and understandable and which contains no hint of blame. If you do not wish to use optional cookies, please read our, You can report a spam IP or email address. You say "in some situations [Rosenberg] seems to suggest that connection is all that matters and that it is better to drop boundaries rather than risk losing connection [He]tells a story about a school principal who comes upon a dejected student while hurrying to join an important meeting for which she is quite late. I believe we are connected more deeply when we receive the feelings and needs being expressed rather than the thought." Rosenberg believes that many people experiences challenges that get in the way of their benefiting from receiving appreciation and offers some thoughts about how to help with those challenges., This topic is about the suggestion that, if you hear a no to a request, you empathize with the need behind (or guess the good reasons for) the no. I see it offering connection to some aspects of deeper meaning. Most often, I dont find that requests lead to these sort of problems. You also say, "the practice of paraphrasing' seems to be based on an assumption that the other person isn't capable of expressing feelings for themselves, and is therefore somewhat condescending. Its not about assuming the other cant express feelings for themselves. Thanks for reaching out! As far as moralistic judgments go I dont entirely agree with the premise that we cant stop making [moralistic] judgments." All that NVC says is that, when trying to connect with another human being, there are often more fruitful things to focus on, in our speaking, and in our listening, than on the sort of thinking that many people habitually focus on. Here are some examples of global labels, and how they could be better rendered as specific critiques of behavior instead of character: As MFP put it, the essence of a you message is simply this: Im in pain and you did it to me. And theres usually this subtext: You were bad and wrong for doing it to me. When people slight us, it may be true that they are entirely, or almost entirely, to blame. You say "Clean Talk allows for the expression of anger in the same manner as other emotions and contrast this with NVCs encouragement to transform anger and then express what was at the heart of our anger. No Captcha, no questions, no counting animals, no puzzles, no math. One way of expressing the concern behind NVCs advice on this is that it can be harmful to praise or offer compliments that imply that there is an objective standard of goodness and that the speaker is entitled to pronounce judgments on behalf of that objective standard. It seems like youve been busier, and I dont know if thats just because your classes are hard this semester or you just havent been as interested in hanging out [Thoughts]. MFP lay out 10 commandments to follow when youre talking with your significant other. These are portrayed as objective standards divorced from subjective experience, and are deeply associated with extrinsic reward and punishment, social approval and disapproval. Also, expressing two different levels of "wants" may help "connect the dots" regarding the meaning one is making out of a situation, in a way that expressing only one level (even if it is at a deep "need" level) might not. Having gone through this process, you now express whats up for you: There isnt anger expressed in this, but only because after the processing, anger is no longer the dominant emotion being felt. This pseudo-objectivity and deep association with extrinsic motivators render such language and judgments as instruments of social and interpersonal control in ways that make conversations involving moral disagreements unsafe and fraught with challenge. Brett & Kate McKay September 17, 2014 Last updated: September 25, 2021. Such zingers aim to point our their flaws and tear down their worth. PNDC offers forms for sharing interpretations in ways that are likely to support connection. You write, "It's my belief that when we attempt to hide our judgments, they emerge anyway. There is a way in which I agree with you, in thinking that NVC misses some opportunities for supporting people in relating to and talking about interpretations more explicitly and skillfully. The idea of making empathy guesses in the case where the other person says no is also an example of suggesting something for teaching purposes that wouldnt necessarily always be done that way in practice. We have developed fast and simple plugins for the most popular CMS such as WordPress spam protection plugin, Joomla, Drupal and other plugins. I think his talk of never hearing thoughts was meant as a wake-up-call to people "lost in their heads" who might believe they can rely purely on reason to navigate through conflict, without opening themselves to feelings, compassion, and empathic understanding. And, Im wondering what additional measures might support safety/nonviolence? They are the judgments that go into formulating what will be expressed. You write "Dr. Rosenberg appears to consider only the most negative of these definitions as the meaning of a judgment essentially, to equate judgment with condemnation. Tech/Talk is a lightweight, portable 8 message, multi-level AAC device that helps individuals communicate using direct selection. In this case, the judgment may still be present, but the driving energy that created, strengthened and sustained the judgment is likely to be gone or greatly weakened because Im not identified with believing the judgment or focusing on it, neither am I resisting it, and Im attending to the underlying concern that the judgment arose to call attention to. I agree that under many circumstances it could be off-putting to hear this. Regrettably, I imagine that many NVC practitioners do, some of the time, simply push away or suppress their moralistic judgments in ways that lead them to ultimately leak out in harmful ways. The only way I can make sense of it is if you are objecting to the wording would you be willing? which is one common way of phrasing a request. Its assumed that it makes sense to look for ways to honor everyones needs, so that (to a very real extent) there are no winners and losers everyone gets to win. Use tab to navigate through the menu items. What I say then would be an honest expression of what Im really feeling at that point. The body's immune system can also function more optimally by crowding out inflammatory . The main risk is that, when anger is expressed, the listener is likely to infer the presence of blame and moralistic judgment, and this typically stimulates defensiveness in ways that are likely to interfere with optimal communication. You write "Clean Talk requires that the speaker state how they would benefit as a way of fully owning what they want. In principle, I generally like this idea. Your demeanor can truly be wielded like a weapon. After practicing NVC for decades, he still carried around a notebook where he would record his judgments, so that he could work on transforming them when he had a chance. I notice that you seem concerned about NVC practitioners not sharing certain things, yet I have no idea why not sharing these would be of concern. So, while there's a lot in the subjective experience of anger that doesn't seem to be about thought, thought plays a critical role in the phenomenon of anger. What NVC recommends is that the speaker express how the other persons actions have contributed to them personally. That is, if your partner is unwilling to meet your needs, create a plan to meet those needs yourself, but dont do so in a way thats specifically designed to punish your partner. 30, 33, 72, 86, 122, etc.).. You write "Without expressing judgments, for example, how do I share my most precious beliefs with my children or those I teach or mentor? If you approached me with the Clean Talk expression, "I want to connect with you and then stopped talking, I might feel frustrated with you for beating around the bush, and putting the burden on me to figure out what you meant by that and to propose a way of addressing it. "You're acting so childish right now.". In so doing, MFP write, your partner can hear what youre feeling without being overwhelmed or bludgeoned by it. Here are some examples: Even more than what we say, our body language conveys how were actually feeling. I think the logic is basically that sharing interpretations is viewed as likely to stimulate arguments about whose interpretation is true, in a way that diverts attention away from matters that would be less divisive and more important to talk about namely, what needs are at issue, and what could be done to address those needs? You say, "On one hand, this paraphrasing or guessing seems to be trying to compensate for the incapacity of the original exchange to express reasons, which are a type of judgment Its not about any incapacity to express reasons in the model, insofar as the other person is presumed, more often than not, to not know or care about the model. You express a concern that, "NVC loses a precious opportunity here, particularly for parents, mentors, teachers, and others who wish to acknowledge work well done or to offer blessing or support. Im not sure what you think NVC is advocating for that that would prevent this from happening? CleanTalk is a SaaS spam protection service for Web sites. Id like for us to be more committed as a couple and to know what you think about the future of our relationship [Needs]., Just as a partial message can be misconstrued, so too can a contaminated message. One example of this is that excess focus on thinking can be risky at times, in the relational realm, but abstract thought is essential to teaching. Global labels can feel highly satisfying to hurl at someone when youre angry and can seem completely justifiable at the time. All Speakers. I am also intrigued by the ideas of Powerful Non-Defensive Communication (PNDC), as developed by Sharon Strand Ellison. It can be installed on glass or plexiglas window, doors and thick walls. The desire to escape shame seems to be a driving factor in substance abuse and many other unwanted behaviors, and so shaming would potentially be tragically counterproductive. If it's a spam bot, then CleanTalk blocks this comment or registering. Neither usage is intended to imply the sort of connotations conventionally associated with distinctions between wants and needs. Avoiding the word need when using NVC helps reduce the chances of people making these (understandable) associations with these words that are spurious to the actual intention. You also say "it seems to be inviting a discussion of reasons with no clear guidelines for how reasons might be expressed safely using NVC. Actually, one of the main reasons for suggesting guessing the reason, as opposing to simply asking for a reason, is to model the type of reasons one is looking to hear. Just install and forget. But when you lead with that blame, the instigator will instantly erect walls of defensiveness that will make working through the issue together impossible. Many NVC practitioners express a need as a single word, in a way that isn't always as expressive an clear as it could be. So, I feel scared, wanting to be safe from moralistic judgments based on standards that I don't understand and wouldn't necessarily agree with. Its written by men (one of which runs a mens support group) and includes lots of concrete, useful, practical tips. Its a bit of an odd practice, and requires some practice to do skillfully, but it can be effective. 4 Reasons Why "Clean Talk Communication" is Important During some of my recent coaching sessions, I have both noticed my clients leaning toward wordiness and/or my clients would have to address wordiness in others. Exploring these topics has been rich for me. Dr. Rosenberg dealt with some of the problematic aspects of our interpretations, the stories we tell ourselves, by encouraging people to shift their focus, to attend more to other components of experience that he felt were ultimately more important. [This is originally began as an email message to the author of the comparison, Alyce Barry, and so is written as if to her.]. Over time, our energy may more naturally go the a way of relating that is not so driven by judgments. Maybe I would need to see some examples of what you would enjoy better, to sense into the advantages. If your partner complies, shell only be doing it to avoid the consequences of your threat, and if she doesnt, the argument is going to escalate and/or keep reoccurring. You mention Rosenberg's "suggestion that we guess what the other person is feeling and needing, which seems to assume the other person isn't capable of describing it, and therefore rather condescending." We are simply talking about the case where all we really know is that they said no to our request. I imagine trying to express all such judgments as leading to an infinite regress, and I can't imagine how it could be viable to assert that it would be necessary or beneficial to express these. (I find the story you cite on p. 113 in NVC: A Language of Life.) . (See also item V-C(1) below.). 8. That implicit distinction is what allowed him to talk about the dangers of focusing on thought (in Relationship Talk), while demonstrating adroit thinking (in Concept Mapping Talk), without there being any actual contradiction. You also write, "In my opinion, every time Dr. Rosenberg says 'I need,' he's really saying 'I believe that I require this. Again, no. You say, "It's my belief that anger and other emotions are signals to let us know what's happening around us." Acknowledging our judgments, without feeding" them, and attending to what they point to in a different way. The talking wall operates by using a thin durable Mylar diaphragm for sound transfer. . This is a matter of sensing what is important to us in a judgment, and finding a new, more satisfying way of thinking about the issue which fully honors what is important to us, and which also honors the humanity of everyone involved. That said, I see some advantages to the way Clean Talk seems to frame this. Rosenberg refuses to say the conventional things about violence to try to disrupt the static thinking about this topic that ultimately leads to nowhere near as good an outcome as he believes would otherwise be possible. Clean 21 Cleanse Program . Whole messages consist of 4 parts: We havent been spending as much time together [Observation]. nwcompass~org?subject=Feedback%20on%20your%20NCC%20post%3A%20Response%20to%20a%20comparison%20of%20Clean%20Talk%20and%20NVC, A Comparison of Clean Talk and Nonviolent Communication (NVC), nwcompass.org/bob-wentworth/blog/cleantalk-nvc-response/, Response to a comparison of Clean Talk and NVC. ";s:7:"keyword";s:24:"clean talk communication";s:5:"links";s:783:"Rose Blumkin Net Worth, Slingshot Ride Death Video, Edinburgh Council Request Bigger Bin, Lisbon Carnival 2023 Dates, Raulito Navaira Net Worth, Articles C
";s:7:"expired";i:-1;}